Justice Elena Kagan and Roberts draw distinctions between TikTok and ByteDance as speakers, suggesting that the ban-or-sale law is more targeted at ByteDance, as a foreign entity, having free speech rights in the US, rather than the app. It sounds like TikTok’s lawyer is arguing any changes made to TikTok’s algorithm would still be a decision from the app, not ByteDance. “The government’s fear is that China could come in and pressure TikTok through ByteDance … to alter that mix of content to make it too pro-Chinese or too anti-American. That is very much directly a content based charge, straight at TikTok,” Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, says.
Just In
- The Galaxy S26 FE has leaked in every color, and at least one has some personality
- The ‘Manosphere’ Isn’t a Movement. It’s a Multibillion-Dollar Grievance Industry
- Apple sweetens trade-in values for iPhones, iPads, Macs, and even some Android phones
- The Hottest New AI Chatbot Is Just a Guy Answering Your Questions
- A production snag could leave the iPhone 18 Pro in short supply
- Samsung’s new 200MP ISOCELL HPC sensor rethinks how pixels capture light
- Anker just exposed a big problem with portable power stations
- AI models keep escaping their sandboxes, and Kimi K3 is the latest to join the party


