Justice Elena Kagan and Roberts draw distinctions between TikTok and ByteDance as speakers, suggesting that the ban-or-sale law is more targeted at ByteDance, as a foreign entity, having free speech rights in the US, rather than the app. It sounds like TikTok’s lawyer is arguing any changes made to TikTok’s algorithm would still be a decision from the app, not ByteDance. “The government’s fear is that China could come in and pressure TikTok through ByteDance … to alter that mix of content to make it too pro-Chinese or too anti-American. That is very much directly a content based charge, straight at TikTok,” Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, says.
Just In
- Vivo Y300 GT With MediaTek Dimensity 8400 SoC, 7,620mAh Battery Launched: Price, Specifications
- Google Chrome is getting an AI-powered scam sniffer for Android phones
- Vivo’s X Fold 5 Specifications Leaked; Said to Get 6,000mAh Battery, Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC
- Apple Silicon Chips for Upcoming Mac Models, AI Servers Reportedly in Development
- Google Messages finally gets proper unsend functionality with ‘Delete for everyone’
- Microsoft Surface Laptop and Pro raise the price barrier for budget shoppers
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge to Use Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 Display Protection
- Watch CDs conquer car skips in this classic BBC clip