Justice Elena Kagan and Roberts draw distinctions between TikTok and ByteDance as speakers, suggesting that the ban-or-sale law is more targeted at ByteDance, as a foreign entity, having free speech rights in the US, rather than the app. It sounds like TikTok’s lawyer is arguing any changes made to TikTok’s algorithm would still be a decision from the app, not ByteDance. “The government’s fear is that China could come in and pressure TikTok through ByteDance … to alter that mix of content to make it too pro-Chinese or too anti-American. That is very much directly a content based charge, straight at TikTok,” Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, says.
Just In
- I just watched Project Hail Mary, here’s why it’s one of the best movies of the year
- A terrific MacBook Air rival just made its debut, but you likely won’t be able to buy it
- How BYD Got EV Chargers to Work Almost as Fast as Gas Pumps
- Google experiments with AI-generated headlines in search results
- Cyberattack on a Car Breathalyzer Firm Leaves Drivers Stuck
- Google will still let you sideload apps, but there’s a catch now
- I Tried DoorDash’s Tasks App and Saw the Bleak Future of AI Gig Work
- Xiaomi SU7 EV makes Tesla look bad with sheer style and substance


