Justice Elena Kagan and Roberts draw distinctions between TikTok and ByteDance as speakers, suggesting that the ban-or-sale law is more targeted at ByteDance, as a foreign entity, having free speech rights in the US, rather than the app. It sounds like TikTok’s lawyer is arguing any changes made to TikTok’s algorithm would still be a decision from the app, not ByteDance. “The government’s fear is that China could come in and pressure TikTok through ByteDance … to alter that mix of content to make it too pro-Chinese or too anti-American. That is very much directly a content based charge, straight at TikTok,” Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, says.
Just In
- Adobe MAX 2025: All the Top Announcements for Adobe’s Creative Suite
- Review: Alienware 16X Aurora
- The Republican Plan to Reform the Census Could Put Everyone’s Privacy at Risk
- This Is the Nuclear-Powered Ship Deployed in Trump’s War on Drug Boats
- AI Will Kill the Smartphone—and Maybe the Screen Entirely
- Why AI Breaks Bad
- Divorced? With Kids? And an Impossible Ex? There’s AI for That
- AI and the End of Accents






