Justice Elena Kagan and Roberts draw distinctions between TikTok and ByteDance as speakers, suggesting that the ban-or-sale law is more targeted at ByteDance, as a foreign entity, having free speech rights in the US, rather than the app. It sounds like TikTok’s lawyer is arguing any changes made to TikTok’s algorithm would still be a decision from the app, not ByteDance. “The government’s fear is that China could come in and pressure TikTok through ByteDance … to alter that mix of content to make it too pro-Chinese or too anti-American. That is very much directly a content based charge, straight at TikTok,” Francisco, TikTok’s lawyer, says.
Just In
- NASA’s New Space Telescope Is Poised to Discover Hidden Facets of the Universe
- I never cared about Mac desktop widgets until I found this app
- Samsung thinks Exynos 2700 can beat Qualcomm’s best next-gen chip
- Apple’s September 2026 event: Everything we know about the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone Ultra launch event
- Samsung may be planning two Galaxy S27 Ultra sizes next year
- In China, AI has reached dumpling shops where you also get to feed on compute tokens
- ASUS’ less powerful Googlebook could still cost a small fortune
- Pixel Watch 5 vs. Galaxy Watch 9 vs. Apple Watch Series 11: There’s more than one way to take your health seriously






